Dear,
Mr Rupert Murdoch
Recently it has risen to my attention from some research I have
conducted, that you’re considering to start charging for your online news content.
Firstly before I continue I want to state how disappointed I was when I found
this to be true. I admire the work you have done and support you abundantly
from a business perspective such as by building yourself a successful empire.As a young adult in this society I can understand many people my age don’t care about news but when they do, they turn straight to the e media platform to get the news they want. By charging for this content you will be closing the doors on educating and informing people which goes against the ethics of the internet, as it was created to inform individuals. You have such a successful empire already which earns over millions annually why would you want to make more money from us? Especially in a time of recession where consumers are finding it hard to live and are spending their money wisely, what makes you think that this move will be successful and increase your profits?
The rise of UGC has seen consumers become producers, it has
also allowed citizen journalist in which now consumers/readers put all their
trust into and would rather read articles produced by the "average person". I feel charging for online content will just turn readers away from
your institution and they will go to UGC which is free and get all their news
from there, it may not be so accurate but then yet again nor may your news
articles be as you have many gatekeepers excluding vital information from the
readers.
Digital revolution has played an important role in this era it
has given users a better way to consume what they want, where they want all for
the cost of £0. This then leads me into social networking which has become a
popular way for people to interact and breaking news can be spread within seconds
whereas your news content would take some time to update. This then becomes an issue on why would consumers want
to pay for late news from your online platform? when social networking such as
twitter provides it much faster. In conclusion Mr Murdoch you make enough money from your print/brodcast system which I understand has decreased in the last couple of years, but it's till surviving and making you money, you should be happy with that. There is no reason to charge for anything more unless you want to see your empire crash. The new generation don’t want to spend their hard earnt money on unnecessary things, so make the right choice and keep your content free. You can still make money from E media, via advertisements; if you keep it free you will have a higher demand, which means you can charge more for your advertisements.
Please take this letter into consideration and make the wise
decision.
You’re sincerely,
Zamaan
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeletedear zamaan
ReplyDeletei take your points into consideration and your point of UGC although it allows the audience with news,its not all accurate and citizen journalists will not always be able to be at the right place at the right time. Even though your point of people can consume news from other institutions can be argued however due to the rise of digital media most things are now going online.
Your sincerely murdoch